By Howard Schneider
(Reuters) – Import tariffs during President-elect Donald Trump’s first term broadly lowered stock values on the day they were unveiled, and were associated with lower future profits, sales and employment for the firms whose equity prices were hit the hardest, new analysis by Federal Reserve Bank of New York staff concluded.
Firms exposed to trade with China in particular, about half of publicly listed companies, saw bigger stock market losses on days when import tariffs were announced during 2018 and 2019, and over the ensuing two years saw profits, for example, that were about 13% lower than others.
“One key motivation for imposing tariffs on imported goods is to protect U.S. firms from foreign competition. By taxing imports, domestic prices become relatively cheaper, and Americans switch expenditure from foreign goods to domestic goods,” New York Fed economists including Mary Amiti, head of labor and product market studies in the bank’s research group, wrote in the analysis. But “most firms suffered large valuation losses on tariff-announcement days. We also document that these financial losses translated into future reductions in profits, employment, sales, and labor productivity.”
The paper adds to other research estimating that tariffs present a drag on activity and comes as policymakers, companies and economic researchers try to gauge what lies ahead as Trump vows to ratchet import duties even higher in his second term. Trump and his advisers see the tariffs as a way to raise revenue for the federal government, though the question of how the cost of import levies is spread across producers, importers and consumers is a thorny one.
Benefits from tariffs are hard to come by, the New York Fed’s research team concluded, “because global supply chains are complex and foreign countries retaliate…Our results show that firms experienced large losses in expected cash flows and real outcomes. These losses were broad-based, with firms exposed to China experiencing the largest losses.”
The analysis builds on a prior study by the same research team that estimated the first Trump administration’s trade war made firms and households worse off by a factor of around 3%.
While Trump doesn’t take office until Jan. 20, economists at the Fed and in the private sector are racing to try to frame in broad terms what the fallout of new rounds of tariffs might be.
Trump for example has threatened levies as high as 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, with another 10% on top of what is already imposed on Chinese goods.
Such a move “would push all three North American economies close to or into recession,” Ben May, director of global macroeconomic research at Oxford Economics, wrote in an analysis on Wednesday, with sluggish or negative growth in the U.S. for the next two years and world trade down by 10%.
What Trump actually does, however, remains uncertain, and some analysts argue that his opening threats may be dialed back.
While the policies Trump has mentioned would amount to a “stagflationary shock” leading to higher prices and much slower U.S. growth, “we don’t think Trump is likely to follow through,” EY Chief Economist Greg Daco wrote this week. “Trade policy will be transactional over the next four years with protectionist measures used to extort trade, immigration and other political concessions.”
“We have to let this play out,” Fed Chair Jerome Powell said at an event in New York on Wednesday after reciting a long list of unknowns, including what Trump may actually decide to do and how other countries might respond.
Still, “we’re modeling this, we’re looking at it, we’re evaluating it, we’re observing,” Powell said, though not in a way that will figure into Fed decisions until policies change and begin to influence economic outcomes and forecasts.
“Similar answer in terms of immigration,” where Trump has pledged to deport undocumented residents, Powell said.